What two things did you discover during your research that amazed you? Did you take any special trips to learn about the topics you cover in The Engraver’s Secret?
During the seven to eight years I spent writing The Engraver’s Secret, I completed masses of research before I started writing and also during the writing process. The search engine on my computer was constantly open, along with etymology websites to check the accuracy of words and objects for specific times or places. For example, if cobalt blue pigment wasn’t invented until 1803, then I didn’t use the term in the seventeenth-century timeline, but rather used the more accurate terms of ultramarine or smalt.
Given that I was constantly checking the etymology of words, I was amazed how much languages have evolved over the centuries. If I wanted to be 100 percent historically accurate, the seventeenth-century dialogue would have been completely different, sounding something akin to Geoffrey Chaucer or Constantijn Huygens. It would have been very difficult to understand, unless you had a PhD in European linguistics.
Although I studied European history at university, I didn’t become familiar with the important role of begijnhofs in Flanders until I began researching my book. These religious complexes, designed to house lay religious women in a community, became enormously popular from the thirteenth century in Western Europe. Antwerp has a particularly well-preserved Begijnhof, which is now used as private housing. For the purposes of my story I used some artistic licence to create a group of modern-day begijnen living there for my story. The Begijnhof is such a peaceful place, which contrasted perfectly with my characters who become caught up in a dangerous search for lost treasures.
I visited Antwerp numerous times while researching and writing The Engraver’s Secret to become familiar with its major historic sites, such as the former home and studio of the artist Rubens (now the Rubenshuis museum), the Plantijn-Moretus printing museum, major churches and the catherdral, the Begijnhof, the Brabo fountain in Grote Markt. It was fun to learn about the origins of the name Antwerp and even the hand-shaped biscuits that were popularised in the city.
There are two timelines set in Antwerp: modern day and seventeenth century. What advantages and difficulties did this pose in the writing of The Engraver’s Secret?
I’ve always enjoyed reading dual timeline novels because it allows me to experience a story from two different perspectives. It’s like being at a party where you interact with guests in the garden, then you move inside the house to chat with other people, and discover the two conversations are related. Different people, different viewpoints, same story. Or are they? Perhaps they’re different stories, but with strong connections.
Experimenting with such interconnections is one of the reasons I enjoy writing dual timelines. It allows me to pose questions in one timeline then see how they relate to another, reveal the actions and motives of one character then link them to another character, years or centuries apart.
Keeping the reader interested in two stories simultaneously is the main challenge when writing a dual timeline story. Each timeline needs enough forward momentum and pacing, enough links between the two stories, and enough questions about the past and future, to make the novel intriguing. At the same time, there can’t be too many questions, otherwise the reader may become confused or overwhelmed.
I wrote one timeline in full, then the second, which allowed me to completely focus on one set of characters and era at a time. In subsequent drafts, I pieced together the two stories like a jigsaw puzzle, providing links between certain events, characters, themes, locations, even objects.
While writing, I developed a large spreadsheet to help organise the various parts of the story and show their connections. The spreadsheet included a brief description of each chapter, which characters are present or mentioned, key themes, relevant dates or times, focal objects – for example, a seventeenth-century map folio – and also the questions posed at the close of each chapter. These include mystery questions about events that have occurred in the past, and suspense questions about what may happen next. Hopefully, by the end of the story, the main questions are resolved.
I also rely on trusted beta readers and editors who read the manuscript with fresh eyes and point out any parts of the story which may be confusing or too complicated, or places where the links are either too vague or too obvious. Finding the balance is the main challenge.